I personally experienced the transition from having no broadband connection to being able to enjoy the convenience brought about by Internet access. According to a senior correspondent for NYTimes.com, the Internet has integrated so deeply into our life that "few recall what life was like without it" (Cowell, 2014). I agree with the article that the availability of information on the Internet allows people to learn new skills and retrieve information easily in a short amount of time as compared to traditional means. However, it fails to take into account of other important factors, such as skills and literacy level, which determine the amount of information one can access from the Internet.
As a user who has been exposed to digital technology since I was young, googling and skimming through the results to answer my queries is a piece of cake. On the other hand, if I were to ask my parents to search the Internet on how to bake a cake, most probably they would not be able to even if you give them the fastest broadband and computer. In my opinion, the article above focuses solely on the advantages IT technology can bring about to everyone from any part of the world, be it developed or rural regions. What it did not take into account is that digital technology may be new to a person, and it requires the user to pick up a new set of skills before being able to fully benefit from it.
One can say that skills can be picked up over time, and the modern IT technology including most Internet pages are designed for least complication and easy usage. Having said that, one must also understand that opening a browser and typing the web address are not the only skills required to surf the net. Just like newspaper and books, the Internet also consists of words. This brings us to the point that literacy is also a prerequisite to surf the Internet and extracting the information that the user wants. This is especially crucial in rural regions as education tends to be another issue in these places. In another article about bridging the digital divide in Africa, Treisman(2014) asserts that with more than 33% of the people in Liberia being unable to read or write, “this high-tech approach is insufficient to reach all citizens”. As such, having Internet access does not mean that one can learn new skills and retrieve information from it.
To sum up, the article does well in stating the social impact of Internet access and usage, and how it can improve the lives in rural regions. However, in my opinion, the article seems to ignore the other factors that might affect the process of improvement. In other words, the article merely mention the advantages that the Internet can bring about, and ignore the underlying criterial.
Reference
Cowell, A (2014, Jan 23). Embracing the Power of the Internet. Retrieved September 6, 2014, from
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/world/europe/embracing-the-power-of-the-internet.html?_r=0
Euromonitor International (2011, Feb 11). Global digital divide persists but is narrowing. Retrieved September 6, 2014, from
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/24/world/europe/embracing-the-power-of-the-internet.html?_r=0
Euromonitor International (2011, Feb 11). Global digital divide persists but is narrowing. Retrieved September 6, 2014, from
http://blog.euromonitor.com/2011/02/global-digital-divide-persists-but-is-narrowing-1.html
Treisman, L (2014, Jan 24). Access to information: bridging the digital divide in Africa. Retrieved September 6, 2014, from
http://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2014/jan/24/digital-divide-access-to-information-africa
-Edited 12 September 2014
Treisman, L (2014, Jan 24). Access to information: bridging the digital divide in Africa. Retrieved September 6, 2014, from
http://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2014/jan/24/digital-divide-access-to-information-africa
-Edited 12 September 2014
Hi Looyong,
ReplyDeleteWe find that your thesis is understandable but is not strong and seems like a mere statement more than a thesis statement. As it does not allow room for discussion (you simply state that you agree ....). It also does not allow you to have any rebuttals or debates in your subsequent paragraphs. Furthermore, we feel that your concluding paragraph does not link back/re-emphasized your thesis statement as you went back to talk about the article again instead of wrapping up your response. (It did well in stating social impact ....)
Thank you!
You present a good summary here, Looyong. You also transition well to your response. I especially like the way you personalize the Internet usage issue by mentioning your family.
ReplyDeleteWhat may still need some refining, as the other reviewers have mentioned, is your thesis. In your conclusion I see a sentence that may help you (wink wink).
There are also some language issue to review here:
-- an recurring issue
-- account of other important factors
-- Having said that, one (Did 'one' say it, or did you?)
-- In other words, the article merely mention the advantages that the Internet can bring about, and ignore the underlying criterial. (s-v agreement?)
Thanks for the hard work!